Comments on: Fon Security Scenarios http://security.dj/?p=39 Security Evangelist Dr. Fredrik Björck shares views on managing information security. Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:09:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Fredrik Björck http://security.dj/?p=39&cpage=1#comment-1059 Fredrik Björck Fri, 01 May 2009 18:56:59 +0000 http://security.dj/?p=39#comment-1059 Hi Rob, This blog was started in 2009, but the Fon article was written already in 2007. But since so many people wanted to read it, I published it to the blog and made a fictional date for it at the blog. The criticism is still valid since Fon distributed a large number of access points with these flaws, even if newer access points have more security. Best regards /Fredrik Hi Rob,
This blog was started in 2009, but the Fon article was written already in 2007. But since so many people wanted to read it, I published it to the blog and made a fictional date for it at the blog. The criticism is still valid since Fon distributed a large number of access points with these flaws, even if newer access points have more security. Best regards /Fredrik

]]> By: rob http://security.dj/?p=39&cpage=1#comment-1055 rob Fri, 01 May 2009 17:23:44 +0000 http://security.dj/?p=39#comment-1055 I'm a bit confused about the status of this post. At the foot of the page it says it was posted 1 Jan 2009; at the top it says "Update Jan 15 2007". Is the criticism of Fon security still valid as of May 2009? Apart from this, the report is very helpful, and easy to understand. Thank you. I’m a bit confused about the status of this post. At the foot of the page it says it was posted 1 Jan 2009; at the top it says “Update Jan 15 2007″. Is the criticism of Fon security still valid as of May 2009?

Apart from this, the report is very helpful, and easy to understand. Thank you.

]]>